Thorny issues in prosecuting polygamist sect

One question is whether Texas will retain custody of 416 children. Experts say criminal charges are likely, too.

By Faye Bowers | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

from the April 14, 2008 edition

Page 1 of 2

PHOENIX - By removing more than 400 children from a religious compound in Texas earlier this month, state authorities carried out one of the largest mass removals of minors from their parents in the country. They also set in motion a future face-off between the state and a religious movement that seeks to live in a closed society, making oversight difficult if not impossible.

Those 416 children are now in state protective custody near Eldorado, Texas, where the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS) owns the secluded, 1,691-acre Yearning for Zion ranch. One-hundred-thirty-nine women, who willingly left the compound, are with the children.

For the children, the next step comes this Thursday, when state Judge Barbara Walthers has scheduled a hearing to determine if they all should remain in the custody of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) for a longer period of time, perhaps permanently.

What comes after that depends on whether the state's investigation results in criminal charges against any of the adults at the FLDS compound. Court documents, in which Texas sought judicial approval to search the Yearning for Zion ranch and to take temporary custody of the children, state that many of the men had multiple wives and that several girls younger than 16 were either pregnant or already mothers as a consequence of a "spiritual marriage" to an older man. Texas law prohibits polygamy and marriages before 16 years of age.

The case is a potentially thorny one in which Texas will have to take care not to violate the First Amendment rights of the church and, thus, jeopardize any future prosecution. The same holds true for any federal case that may be brought: FBI agents have taken part in the search of the ranch, possibly to determine whether underage girls were transported across state lines, between FLDS compounds in Arizona and Texas, for illegal purposes.

Experts say the issues are as complicated as any they've seen, but most agree that religious freedoms do not trump the rights of children to a safe and secure environment.

"The state was absolutely within its rights to take these children," says Marci Hamilton, an expert on church-state issues at the Cardozo School of Law in New York. "There is no religious defense to child abuse and no problem with the separation of church and state when the state stays focused on the abuse."

In addition to the civil action of taking custody of the minors, the state is likely to press criminal charges in this case, says Ellen Marrus, codirector of the Center for Children at the University of Houston's Law Center. "When there are so many children, so many [alleged] atrocities involved, the state is likely to bring criminal charges against the individuals causing harm," she says.

The mass removal was triggered by phone calls on March 29 and 30 from a 16-year-old girl named Sarah to a local shelter, according to court papers. She said she was seeking help for her and her 8-month-old child to escape the Texas ranch. According to court documents, Sarah said that her parents brought her to the ranch three years ago and that about two years later she was "spiritually married to an adult male member of the church," becoming his seventh wife. Sarah went on to say that her husband had physically and sexually abused her.

Page 1 | 2 | Next Page